EDUCAUSE
October 11, 2006I’m at EDUCAUSE this week. I’m also sick but even ill I’m still trilled at being here. Attendance at this conference is essential for me. How does anyone NOT attend???
Yesterday I attended the presentation by Brian Hawkins on the “Grand Challenges”. Among these are access, affordability, assessment/accountability, effectiveness, workforce development, economic development, the change in social contract, etc. Brian challenged us to think about how IT translates to address these challenges. Is IT part of the solution? Is it a contributor? Alternatively, is it “just another cost”. How does IT move beyond being a “negative blip” on the President’s radar? How can it move beyond “just another cost” or a “black hole” of funding?
It occurred to me that, as librarians, we face the same “grand challenge” in much of the same way as IT. How are our libraries contributing to the success of our parent organizations? What are we doing to advance the mission of our institutions? How do we become more than a “cost center”?
It seems to me that we need to do a better job of integrating ourselves into the fabric of our institutions so that we can engage them in a discussion about what “success” looks like for our libraries. We need to work within our institutions to define and describe our libraries’ goals in an institutional context. How do we contribute to the research success of our faculty? How do we contribute to their teaching? How do contribute to student learning?
Evaluation should then occur at all levels (micro, macro and mega). We need to show how we’re contributing to the success of our parent institutions – on all levels. What is mega? It is our impact on society. I have a pet peeve and I have to diverge for a moment (maybe I’ll blog more on this later): academic libraries that do not engage their local communities and in particular their local public libraries. These are important partnerships that should not be overlooked. As academic libraries we are part of a larger community and should feel obligated to contribute to the success of that community. Divisions between academic and public libraries are self-imposed. Those walls should be torn down.
We need to continue to work on new measures. Until we find a way of linking funding requests directly to institutional and societal success, we’ll just be seen as a “black hole” of funding.